Ok, I’ve written a quick little client-side Javascript function that will simulate what a SOPA/PROTECT-IP Internet may look like. Feel free to link it into your website and help spread the word.
Demonstration Page: here
Code: Github Repository
AmericanCensorship.org Infographic
Electronic Frontier Foundation Campaign
On Ubuntu 10.10, it looks something like this:
/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome %U –disk-cache-dir=”/dev/shm”
Which is handy for not writing cache junk to your SSD.
To the Google Chrome installer builders: there are a few things that would be nice to have fixed.
Limited User Account installations: On Windows XP x64 Edition (and probably other versions), trying to install the default Web Install package from here fails with the message “Google Update installation failed with error 0x80070003”. Whatever that means. I have a hunch that on Windows Vista, and Windows 7, the User Account Control stuff might intercept that the installer wants privilege escalation and automatically pop up the right dialog for this.
If I click on the link “Show me help for this issue.”, there’s not much help there. Oddly enough, I was just reading Microsoft’s “Windows User Experience Interaction Guidelines”. The section on “Error Messages / Error Codes” applies here.
I know what you’re trying to say, Google Update is a system service, so it probably wants Administrator rights to my system. It would be nice if it didn’t, maybe if it ran under the Limited User’s profile only. I understand that’s less secure, but ok, I try installing the package with the “Run As” option to escalate privileges to the installer.
The installer completes, as the Administrator account. But wait, where’s the icon in my Limited User Account? Oh no, the default Chrome installer package only installs to the account whose credentials were used to run it! e.g. Only the Administrator account has Chrome now.
Catch-22. So I uninstall you.
Then I see that there is an “Alternate (offline) Google Chrome installer (Windows)”, which allows me to download one version of the installer that installs Chrome “for your own user account only” or a version that installs Chrome “for all user accounts on your computer”.
The first package doesn’t work, for the same reasons the Web Install package doesn’t work.
The second package works, when installed as Administrator, which makes sense. However, when the Installer starts the Chrome Browser for the first time right after installation, it runs the Browser instances as the Administrator account, not as the Limited User Account.
When I go to start it with the Limited User Account, I get two errors. First, “Failed To Create Data Directory, Google Chrome cannot read and write to its data directory.” Second, “Your preferences can not be read. Some features may be unavailable and changes to preferences won’t be saved.”
I select a different directory for my preferences, using the directory chooser.
When I close and restart Chrome, I get the same error, because the –user-data-dir in the Google Chrome shortcut in my Limited User Account somehow gets reset.
If I add –user-data-dir to the Quick Start shortcut, it somehow/sometimes gets reset to something without the –user-data-dir flag the next time Chrome is started, but after that it doesn’t get reset. (I’m not going to debug why this is so.)
If I add –user-data-dir to the shortcut located on my Desktop, it doesn’t get reset.
I have a hunch here that the multiuser installation will work under Windows Vista and Windows 7 because of that weird profile virtualization stuff Microsoft built into them (and which annoys the heck out of software developers, because we never know where a profile’s files are actually stored).
In any case, after all of that, the browser does work fine, but the taste of a bad install experience does not cast a good first impression.
After a few days of eating local in Madrid, the diet of mostly meat, cheese, rice, seafood, olives, and bread can start to get a bit exhausting. One begins to crave vegetables of the leafy green variety, especially when one has Asian parents. Somehow in searching these out, my father and I managed to stumble into two fantastic Chinese restaurants on the same street: Calle de Isabel ‘La Catolica’ by the Plaza de España. It may be a bit cheesy going to Spain to eat Chinese food, but sometimes your intestines just demand it.
Here’s the Google Street View of the places.
[click to open in a new window]
In the first restaurant, we ordered fresh steamed fish in soy sauce with green onions, fried salt and pepper prawns, and some bamboo with shiitake mushrooms (by mistake). In the second restaurant, we ordered pork blood with pig intestines (a rarity almost everywhere outside of Thailand or Taiwan), ma poa tofu, and fried water spinach (also a rarity). I’ll let the pictures speak for themselves.
Ubuntu 10.10, with the Compiz desktop effects enabled, is a formidable user interface. One minor issue is that the graphics refresh ignores the vertical sync by default, leading to some tearing and visual ugliness.
There are three settings that I used to fix this up, with a marked improvement in visual quality. Note: With vertical sync enabled, the UI might feel just a few milliseconds more sluggish than before, because it will wait slightly until the next sync pulse to refresh. This takes a little getting used to, but the overall improvement in the feel of the UI can be worth it. e.g. No more flickering!
Setting 1 is the “Sync To VBlank” item in the CompizConfig Settings Manager:
Setting 2 is in the “X Server XVideo Settings” panel of the NVIDIA X Server Settings control panel.
Setting 3 is in the “OpenGL Settings” panel of the NVIDIA X Server Settings control panel.
